by Nicholas Alexiou

The proposal by the Federation of Hellenic Societies of Greater New York to rename a section of Ditmars Boulevard in Astoria “Little Hellas” undoubtedly carries powerful symbolic significance. It is a call for public recognition of the long-standing Greek presence in the area and a tribute to the generations of immigrants who settled in Astoria, worked, raised families, established businesses, churches, schools, associations, and cultural organizations, and contributed decisively to the social and economic development of New York City. 

Οδηγοίπόλεων και τοποθεσιών

Astoria is not simply another neighborhood in the history of Greek immigration. It is the preeminent symbol of the modern Greek immigrant experience in America. Particularly from the 1960s onward, it emerged as a major center of settlement, employment, social organization, and cultural production. A substantial part of the everyday life of the Greek diaspora was concentrated along its streets: its restaurants and coffeehouses, grocery stores, bakeries, travel agencies, professional businesses, newspapers, the bookstores it once had, community associations, and places of religious and cultural gathering.

In this sense, the name “Little Hellas” does not arbitrarily impose a Greek identity upon Astoria. It institutionally recognizes and inscribes a historical reality within public space. It declares that Greeks were not merely passing through New York. They were, and remain, an integral part of its social history.

A historical community, however, cannot build its future upon a name alone, no matter how significant that name may be. A street sign can recognize the community’s presence, but it cannot by itself preserve its archives, record the oral testimonies of immigrants, teach its history to younger generations, or ensure the continuity of its intellectual and cultural production. The real question, therefore, is not simply whether a section of Ditmars Boulevard will be named “Little Hellas.” The essential question is this: What must be done so that “Little Hellas” corresponds to a living historical community rather than merely commemorating an earlier demographic presence?

From Collective Memory to Historical Self-Consciousness

Every community has a  history. Not every community, however, develops the capacity to know, investigate, interpret, and systematically transmit its history. Collective memory is one thing; organized historical knowledge is another. Memory may survive in family narratives, photographs, songs, celebrations, and personal recollections. Historical knowledge, however, requires documentation, archives, research, critical interpretation, education, and institutional continuity.

A community becomes historical, in the full sociological sense of the term, when it creates the institutions that enable it to transform lived experience into collective historical  knowledge. Such institutions include archives, libraries, museums, university programs, research centers, schools, scholarly journals, newspapers, publishing organizations, oral-history programs, and literary associations. 

These institutions do not merely store the past. They select, classify, document, interpret, and transmit historical experience. They enable later generations not only to remember, but also to know. Above all, they allow those generations to approach the past critically: to study not only achievements and distinctions, but also labor, poverty, class inequalities, discrimination, political action, internal contradictions, and the difficulties of adaptation.

Historical self-consciousness is neither nostalgia nor idealization. It is a critical understanding of the conditions under which a community was formed. Greek immigrants did not arrive in America as the bearers of an abstract and immutable Greek identity. They came to work. They confronted the insecurity and exploitation of immigrant labor, created networks of mutual assistance, and, through collective struggles and daily effort, secured a place within American society. The history of their advancement cannot be separated from the history of their labor.

Astoria as a Social and Historical Place

Astoria should be understood not simply as a “Greek neighborhood,” but as a social archive of modern immigration. Its buildings, commercial streets, restaurants, gathering places, churches, and community associations preserve the traces of an entire historical period. Behind every business and every family home lies a story of migration, labor, mobility, adaptation, and creation.

This history, however, is in danger of disappearing. Astoria is changing. Older generations are passing away, businesses are changing ownership, families are relocating, and the Greek language is receding. Change is a natural element of urban life and cannot be halted through nostalgic appeals. It can, however, be studied, recorded, and incorporated into the public history of the city.

It is precisely here that the deeper significance of “Little Hellas” becomes evident. The designation should serve as the starting point for a broader program of historical recognition. Historical markers are needed at important sites throughout the neighborhood, along with a record of former Greek businesses and organizations, the collection of photographs and documents, a digital historical map, interviews with older residents, and educational programs for students at both the school and university levels. “Little Hellas” must be given historical content.

The Importance of the Hellenic American Project

The Hellenic American Project at Queens College of the City University of New York occupies a particularly important place in this undertaking. HAP was created precisely to collect, preserve, study, and make accessible the history and culture of the Greek diaspora in America. 

An archive is not a warehouse for old objects. It is an institution that produces historical knowledge. A letter, a photograph, a restaurant menu, a recorded interview, a newspaper, a work of art, or a family archive acquires broader social significance when it is classified, preserved, digitized, and made available for research and education.

HAP connects the community with the public university. Through its archives, oral histories, exhibitions, conferences, publications, and research programs, it transforms Greek American experience into publicly accessible knowledge. At the same time, it gives students the opportunity to learn the history of their own city and to participate actively in documenting it.

The work of such a center does not concern specialists alone. It concerns every family that does not want the experiences of earlier generations to disappear. It concerns every community that wishes to understand how it was formed. Ultimately, it concerns American  history itself, because Greek American history is an integral part of it.

For this reason, HAP and similar institutions require moral, financial, and institutional support. The community must recognize that preserving its history entails real costs. It requires specialized personnel, appropriate facilities, preservation systems, technological equipment, digitization, scholarships, researchers, and stable long-term planning. Occasional philanthropy is not enough. Long-term commitments are needed from business leaders, foundations, organizations, universities, and the organized Greek American community.

Funding an archive or a research center is not a secondary cultural expense. It is an investment in collective historical self-consciousness.

Poetry as a Historical Archive

Within this framework, Greek American poetry assumes particular significance. Poetry is not merely an aesthetic expression or an ornament of community life. It is a symbolic institution that transforms lived experience into language and transmits it to future generations. 

The poetry of the diaspora records experiences that are often absent from official archives: the feeling of exile, the immigrant’s loneliness, labor, family separation, memories of the homeland, linguistic change, upward class mobility, alienation, dual identity, and the everyday experience of the city. Poetry preserves not only what happened, but also how it was experienced.

For this cultural production to become part of collective historical  knowledge, however, institutions are necessary. Poems must be published, translated, archived, studied, and taught. Without publishing organizations, literary journals, bookstores and libraries, literary criticism, and university teaching, a substantial part of Greek American literary production remains invisible or is lost.

Supporting poetry, therefore, does not simply mean supporting individual poets. It means strengthening the community’s capacity to express, record, and critically reflect upon its historical experience.

The Need to Strengthen Greek American Studies

The same is true of Greek American Studies. Despite the long presence of Hellenism in the United States, the field has not acquired the institutional autonomy and stability it requires. Relevant scholarship remains dispersed among sociology, history, literature, migration studies, religious studies, and Modern Greek Studies programs. There are distinguished scholars and important studies, but few permanent academic positions, inadequate funding, and only a limited number of research centers devoted exclusively to Greek American Studies.

Greek American Studies should not be regarded as a luxury or as a narrow ethnic specialization. The field examines fundamental questions concerning American society: immigration, labor, urbanization, race, social mobility, religion, language, political participation, intergenerational change, and the formation of identity.

University courses, endowed academic chairs, scholarships, funded research programs, scholarly journals, archives, conferences, and collaborations between universities and the community are therefore urgently needed. Greek American history and literature must also be taught in community schools. It is not enough to offer children a general—and often idealized—image of Greece. They must also learn the history of Greeks in America: the history of their own families and of the communities in which they are growing up. 

From Symbolic Recognition to Institutional Responsibility

The designation “Little Hellas” can become an important step. To acquire genuine historical substance, however, it must be accompanied by concrete commitments.

A permanent program for documenting Greek Astoria should be established. HAP, archives, libraries, and oral-history programs must be strengthened. The digitization of historical collections must be funded. Greek American poetry, writers, and publishing initiatives must be supported. Greek American history and literature must be incorporated into education. Scholarships and university positions must be created. Major organizations and the economically influential members of the Greek American community must assume sustained institutional responsibility.

It is not enough to honor successful Greek Americans at commemorative events. We must support the institutions that document how those achievements became possible and reveal the collective foundation upon which they were built. It is not enough to invoke Greek culture. We must create the material and institutional conditions within which culture can continue to be produced.

The Greek diaspora in America is not simply a peripheral extension of Greece. It constitutes an autonomous center within a polycentric Hellenism. It produces its own historical experience, literature, art, scholarly knowledge, and social institutions. Astoria is one of the most important sites of this production.

“Little Hellas,” therefore, should not be merely a name on a street sign. It must become a public commitment to historical responsibility. The truest way to honor earlier generations is not simply to recognize what they created, but to ensure that their  history will be preserved, studied, taught, and enabled to continue producing knowledge.

Historical communities achieve continuity not simply because they remember their past, but because they create and strengthen the institutions that transform experience into collective historical knowledge. This, ultimately, is the deeper meaning of “Little Hellas.” And this is what must be done. 

• Nicholas Alexiou, PhD – Professor of Sociology at Queens College, CUNY; Founder and Director of the Hellenic American Project (HAP); and President of the Greek American Writers Guild

Source: anamniseis.net

Disclaimer: Opinions expressed throughout this site do not necessarily reflect those of the COSMOS FM Board of Directors, personnel, volunteers, or sponsors.